Dr. Yong Zhao presented “Defining
High-Quality Education at the recent ISTE conference. His argument is for an “Entrepreneurship - Oriented Education”. A few key points of interest were - what
matters, test scores or confidence?, Do you allow exceptional talents to exist
in your educational system, and do you take advantage of the resources you
have, or impoverish them because of test scores? The foundation of his argument is very
thought provoking and he was able to put his argument into words that many of
us wish to say, with extreme clarity and confidence. What an interesting way to break down the
discourse about China exceeding the US in education. I have never thought of the Chinese education
system being so rigorous and not instilling a sense of confidence. How interesting that China did not celebrate the
pisa scores, due to wanting more, the need for talent. His view of China having
the best and worst education system is not something you normally hear in the
news reports. The US on the other hand, is
always near the bottom, and always looking for a way to reach the top. His statement: “Race to the top of what” is a
great example of how we have lost our sense of the purpose of education. The US is always trying to get to the top,
but not really knowing what is ahead, and plans are made based on the
past. Personally, his comments about
George Bush were right on! I agree that
literacy shouldn’t be the top focus of a nation, it should be the foundation. So, if confidence underpins creativity and
innovation, and US students are viewed as confident, is it true what he
suggests? America is still going and prospering because of confidence. Dr. Zhao's comparison between Lady Gaga’s
exceptional talents and putting her in his village to work was a perfect
example of how we design a “common” curriculum and expect all of our students
to succeed. (All national and state
department education personnel should watch this video). He made a valid point about tolerance,
talents, and technology. These three
things will get us a diversity of talents, creativity, and
entrepreneurship. I’ve never really
thought about using technology as a tool to subject or enslave teachers and
students to doing better on standardized tests.
But, this does happen, and we have lost opportunities to explore with
technology. I agree with his ideas and facts, and only hope that the paradigm
shift in education begins soon!
Extremely poignant to me, was the following: “We have to believe every
talent is useful, and do not judge it.
Education has to change and the curriculum should follow the child,
personalized and strength based to enhance their strengths. Schooling has to become product oriented and
make real products”. This poignant
statement relates to the final conclusion chapter of our course text. Ito (2010), “ The challenge is to build roles
for productive adult participation that respect youth expertise, autonomy, and
initiative.” To me, this quote is able
to mesh with Zhao’s ideas of the purpose of education lies with every one of
our children. So, we have to find a way
in which the adults can fit in, and truly understand today’s students and what
they need to be successful. In terms of entrepreneurship,
if we take Ito’s and Zhao’s ideas, we can foster the concept of thinking of
everyone as an entrepreneur and develop a process of guiding kids’
participation in public life that includes, social, recreational, and civic
engagement through a participatory culture.
I actually had tears in
my eyes when Zhao made this statement: “The purpose lies in every one of our
children. Test scores, no matter what,
should not apply to everybody, test scores do not reflect your teaching ability nor your school’s quality. A good education helps every single child maximize
their potential.”
Everyone got teary at the presentation in San Diego! I think the hardest thing for teachers to do is to, as you points out, "respect youth expertise, autonomy, and initiative.”. I think the media ecology assignment can help with that!
ReplyDelete